.INTERNATIONAL STOKE
MANDEVILLE WHEELCHAIR SPORTS FEDERATION OFFICIAL
RULES FOR FENCING INTERNATIONAL WHEELCHAIR FENCING
COMMITTE HISTORICAL NOTE. THE OFFICIAL RULES FOR WHEELCHAIR FENCING WERE FIRST COMPILED BY LESLIE VEAL
FOR THE I.S.M.G.F. SUB COMMITTEE FENCING IN THE EARLY 1970s OF WHICH HE WAS CHAIRMAN UNTIL 1984 .THESE RULES
ARE RELATED TO THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF THE F.I.E., PUBLISHED BE THE A.F.A. OF GREAT
BRITAIN. WHERE THERE ARE NO MODIFICATION THE F.I.E., RULES MUST BE APPLIED. THE
RULES WERE MODIFIED AND UPDATED: THE F.I.E. AND IWFC MAKE AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES FROM TIME TO TIME. THESE CHANGES
ARE USUALLY ANNOUNCED THE SUMMER OF EACH YEAR AND PROMULGATED THE FOLLOWING JANUARY At the Olympic Games for disabled athletes in Seoul (Paralympics 88), a new system of classification for wheelchair fencing was introduced. The final version presented at the Paralympics was a summation of the system already proposed by Rita Strohm of Germany at the European championships in Glasgow 1987, which was later partially modified. It deals with all the effects of an integrated classification which allows athletes with different disabilities (amputee, polios, CP's and paraplegics) the opportunity to compete together Functional tests (to be effected in the wheelchair) consist of an evaluation of the extension and lateral inclination ability of the chest in different positions, with or without the use of a weapon. The tested movements repeat specific technical moves, e.g. lunge, ie a sudden and improvised lateral inclination of the trunk with the weapon in the hand, with simultaneous extension of the elbow, or as many fast return movements of the chest into its original position (or inclination from the opposite side) as for a "point of measurement" (in order to avoid hits by the opponent). A point score as follows is attributed during the tests: 0 Point - no function, movement cannot be put into effect 1 Point - very weak execution, minimum movement 2 Point- weak execution, fair movement 3 Point - normal execution Test No 1 consists of an evaluation of the extension of dorsal musculature: the subject, seated in the wheelchair, from a forward position of the trunk, tries to return to an upright position, contracting the dorsal muscles and maintaining the upper limbs retroflexed. Test No 2 Is an evaluation of lateral balance with abducted upper limbs: the athlete has to move his own centre of gravity laterally to the right and left to the point where he would lose balance, thereby the lateral muscle function of the trunk and of the oblique abdominal can be evaluated as well as the lumbar muscle. Test No 3 (similar to test no 1) evaluates the extension of the trunk, but more specifically the lumbar muscles. The exercise is executed with the hands on the back of the neck, thus excluding both the inertial component of upper limb movement (violently retroflexive in test no 1) and the aid of the upper dorsal muscles of the trunk. Test No 4 Is similar to test no 2, but presents more difficulties, since it must be executed holding the weapon, the weight of which significantly reduces the possibility of lateral inclination of the trunk without losing balance. For an athlete affected by a spinal disability (paraplegia or polio) the muscle strength is evaluated by a point score from 0 - 5 as for ISMWSF and ISOD Actions are those tested by ISMWSF with the addition of shoulder adduction, of thumb resistance, of hip and knee rotation, of foot prone-supination and without fingerspread. For athletes affected by spasticity, dystonia or athetosis, points are awarded for each controlled action as follows: 1 point non functional movement, motory co-ordination is minimal or non-existent. 2 points sequence of movement can only happen very slowly and with difficulty. If effected with rapid repetition, it will not exceed 25% of the normal range of movement. 3 points as above, up to 50% of full range of movement. 4 points slight unco-ordination of movements and/or not more than 75% of normal range of movement. 5 points normal motory co-ordination. In the case of the injury being of orthopaedic origin, and therefore one is faced with problems of ankylosis or even a latent pathology in a reduction of range of movement, the pointscore (from 0 to 5) is expressed as follows:- 0 point no range of movement 1 point minimal range of movement 2 point 1/4 of normal range of movement 3 point 1/2 of normal range of movement 4 point 3/4 of normal range of movement 5 point normal range of movement After the analytical evaluation and functional tests, a classification is given according to the following criteria:- Class 1A Athletes with no sitting balance who have a handicapped playing arm. No efficient elbow extension against gravity and no residual function of the hand which makes it necessary to fix the weapon with a bandage. Such a class is comparable to the old ISMGF 1A, or tetraplegics with spinal lesions level C5/C6. Class 1B Athletes without sitting balance and affected fencing arm. Functional elbow extension but no functional finger flexion. The weapon has to be fixed with a bandage. Comparable to complete tetraplegics level C7/C8 or higher incomplete lesion. Class 2 Athletes with fair sitting balance and normal fencing arm, paraplegic type D1 - D9 (Functional tests 1 and 2 - not totalling more than 4 points ) or incomplete tetraplegics with minimally affected fencing arm and good sitting balance. Class 3 Athletes with good Sitting balance, without support of legs and normal fencing arm, e.g. paraplegics from D10 to L2 (Functional tests 1 and 2 positive - with a pointscore from 5 to 9). Subjects with double above the knee amputation with short stumps, or incomplete lesions above D10 or comparable disabilities can be included in this class, provided that the legs can help in maintaining the sitting balance. Class 4 Athletes with good sitting balance with the support of lower limbs and normal fencing arm, e.g. with lesion below L4 or comparable disability (tests 3 and 4 positive with at least 5 points) Minimal handicap - disability of lower limb comparable to a below-knee
amputation. In the case of cerebral lesion or even in the case of doubt, it is necessary to
complete the evaluation by observing the athlete whilst fencing. The involvement of the athletes themselves in the
classifying procedure is most important, which in fact the signature of an athlete (or
technician) provides within the scope of the classification commission. CATEGORIES.... There will be three categories for each individual event..... A.B. AND C.
1:
A:-
The old class 3 and 4. 1.7 Medical Sub Committee of Wheelchair Fencing Committee 1: The Medical Sub-Committee shall be comprised of Three (3) Members: Medical Doctor Physiotherapist Wheelchair Fencer/Technician, Maitre Des Armes 2: The decision of classifying shall be made by at least Two (2) Members. 3: All provisions will be made for classifications 1.8 Identity Card All Wheelchair Fencers shall have an Identity Card containing the following information: Name Photo Country CATEGORY
2.0 PROTESTS
After the hearing the Final Decision shall be by the Wheelchair Fencing Committee. The protesting Fencer will receive the decision of the Wheelchair Fencing Committee in writing. 3.0 ORGANISATION
3
MODIFICATIONS OF THE RULES OF THE FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE D'ESCRIME (TO BE
APPLIED TO WHEELCHAIR FENCING) Note: These modifications
must be read in conjunction with the English version of the FIE rules (2000). Paragraph numbers in the text refer to the
corresponding paragraph numbers in the FIE rules. These rules are obligatory for competitions of the ISMWSF International
Wheelchair Fencing events. CHAPTER 3. THE FIELD OF PLAY The fencing frame Note: See appendix for diagram
and manufacturers.
t.15 Note: As from January 2002 FIE "Material Rules"
will apply.
THE FENCING WHEELCHAIR
CHAPTER 5- THE ASSAULT When a fencer
systematically or deliberately anticipates the command "Allez", the referee
shall give them a yellow card on the first occasions and then penalise them by a red card for each subsequent repetition of the same offence
in the same bout. See t.114, t.116, t120. When a fencer loses their balance, or changes their sitting position,
when the wheelchair becomes unclamped, earthing clips become unattached, or if there
is any danger to the fencers, the referee, or the spectators, the referee will call halt.
See t.29 REFEREEING AND JUDGING OF HITS Only officials approved by the IWFC will officiate. t.34 "The bout is directed by the referee, who may be seated, and must be in a position to follow the fencing phrases while being able to see the scoring apparatus. PART
2. FOIL "To establish the correct fencing measure, the fencer will sit upright
in the centre of the width of their wheelchairs. One
fencer will bend the fencing arm with the forearm vertical and upper-arm horizontal the
elbow pointing to the other fencer, the other fencer with a straight arm shall touche the
inner edge of the opponent's forearm with the point of th foil. Each fencer must try
his distance. In case of fencers of unequal arm length the fencing mesure is that of the
fencer with the shorter arm. PART 3. EPEE The Conventions of Fencing "To establish
the correct fencing measure, the fencer will sit upright in the centre of the width of
their wheelchair. One fencer will bend the fencing arm with the forearm vertical and
upper-arm horizontal the elbow pointing to the other fencer, the other fencer with a
straight arm shall touch the inner adge of the opponent's forearm with the point of the
epee. Each fencer must try this distance. In case of fencers of unequal arm length
the fencing measure is that of the fencer with the shorter arm. The organisers must provide a flexible lamé "apron" to cover for the non-valid areas. This "apron" is also earthed to the apparatus. It must not abscure any valid target and be firmly fastened in position. The clips on the "aprons" must be in full view of the referee. If these clips become dislodged, the referee must call "Alt", and annul any hit. If a double hit is registered by an established hit and a double hit the fencer who has made the established hit may choose to accept the double hit or ask to have it annulled. (see t.67 e) THE
TARGET "The target at epee is the whole of the upper part of the fencer's body, it comprises any part of the body above a horizontal line
drawn between the top of the folds formed by the thighs and the trunk of the fencer when
in the "On Guard" position. Any portion of the chair above this line is valid
target. PART
4. SABRE "To establish the correct fencing measure, the fencer will sit upright
in the centre of the width of their wheelchair. One fencer will bend the fencing arm with
the forearm vertical and upper-arm horizontal the elbow pointing to the other fencer, the
other fencer with a straight arm shall touch the inner edge of the opponent's forearm with
the point of the sabre. Each fencer must try this distance. In case of fencers of
unequal arm length the fencing measure is that of the fencer with the shorter arm. The
latter may elect for a greater fencing measure, but in on case may the measure exceed that
of the fencer with the longer arm. Where there is a dispute, the referee shall intervene
andtheir decision is final. On the command "On Guard" fencers shall adopt a guard position that satisfies the following requirements: There shall be no contact of blades. The point of a competitor's blade
shall not be advanced beyond the blade of his opponent.
The referee will ensure that neither fencer has an unfair advantage by advancing
his arm significantly more than that of his
opponent. See
t.17 BOOK 2.
ORGANISATION RULES The International Wheelchair Fencing Committee of the International Stoke Mandeville Wheelchair Sports Federation
controls the activities of the Directoire Technique at the Paralympic Games, The World
Championships, The Zonal Championships, The World Cup and ISMWSF Games." RULES FOR THE INTERNATIONAL
WHEELCHAIR FENCING NB. The placing of competitors within each category is strictly according to the decision of the official classifiers authorities who have examined and classified each competitor before the competition. No competitor may appear in a category higher than that in which he has been placed by those authorities. Leg prostheses to be removed during a fencing bout. This
rule will be reviewed after the Paralympics Games 2004. No fencer shall be entered at more than two different weapons in any championships, including all team and individual events. World, and Zonal Championships entries are limited to four (4) fencers of any one nation for each event Paralympic Games, entries are limited to Three (3) fencers of any one Nation for each event World Cup, No limit of fencers. Team Championships at all three weapons for men and women will be held at the same time and place as the individual championships and will take place when there is minimal of three teams,one team per country. o.42 ADD Each team of three must have at least one category
"B" or "C". The fencing measure shall be as category
"A" or "B". APPENDIX A POOLS ON 1 (ONE) PISTE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]()
|